Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mark McGee's avatar

Short answer, yes on plant medicine .. psychedelic medicine is still a matter of doing more research. My January article will address what some people call 'alternative' treatments, so you may find that helpful. While there are some peer-reviewed studies concerning the efficacy of psychedelic medicine for severe stress, severe PTSD, and moderate to severe major depressive disorders, the usage for Ménière's disease does not have as many studies. I will include what I find in the January article. If you need information about that before the January article, let me know.

As for the potential of 'healing' Ménière's, that is also questionable. Some people claim they've been cured of Ménière's, even though ENTs, Neurologists, and other specialists who work with Ménière's patients say the disease is incurable. I can't physically verify the claims of people I don't know personally, but I will say that everyone is unique. I know of at least ten people in my family who have now or had (prior to their death) Ménière's. Because they are family, I had the opportunity to observe or learn about their medical condition in a more personal way. One of my cousins says her ENT says she has 'Ménière's light,' meaning it's not too bad. Other members of my family have experienced a more progressive and difficult type of Ménière's. Everyone is a laboratory of one, so we do a lot of learning, experimenting, and praying.

Thanks! Mark

Expand full comment
Mark McGee's avatar

Hi, Neil. I reported the 'facts' as I 'know' them, not as I 'see' them. My reporting is based on decades of interviews and discussions with doctors and scientists of many different disciplines. I reported from their expertise, not mine.

As for the reader who thought my reporting was 'somewhat odd,' please ask them to contact me directly by commenting here. I will be glad to clarify any aspect of the report that concerns them. I would also want to know what parts of the report they believe are 'incorrect' based on scientific evidence they can share with me. I will gladly 'correct' anything they can prove to be incorrect. I find it odd that they would think my listing dictionary definitions of 'medicine' to be odd. Defining terms is a basic of personal and mass communication.

The quotes you shared from them are opinions, not facts. I know as a journalist that readers and viewers will have varying opinions about reports. They have a right to their opinions, even if their opinions are not based on facts. They accused me of railing against modern medicine and taking a "strong "anti-medicine" stance." That is untrue and borders on being a libelous statement. I will want to hear their proof, their factual evidence that my article was 'anti-medicine' and a railing against modern medicine. I am not now nor never have been 'anti-medicine.' I quoted from the Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, Mount Sinai Hospital, Stanford Health Care, Saint Luke’s Health System, Pharmacy Times, The National Library of Medicine, Menieres.org.uk, Vestibular.org, and ClinicalTrials.gov. Does that sound 'anti-medicine' to you? I don't think so.

You accused me, again, of not being neutral in reporting facts concerning this topic. You wrote - "the article does not succeed and is may come across as attempting to scare people away from use of medicinal treatments." Is that your opinion or are you making a truth claim? If it is your opinion, then I will simply disagree with your opinion. However, if you are making a truth claim then I will want to see your evidence that my intention in writing the article is to 'scare' people away from using medicinal treatments. I have used medicine prescribed by doctors to help in the management of my Meniere's attacks for years, so I am not anti-medicine. I also read all of the information provided by medical providers, pharmacists, and pharmaceutical companies for each medicine I use. They all include indepth 'warnings' about potential 'side effects' from using the drugs and the importance of checking into potentially bad interactions with other drugs a person is using. The first part of my article include warnings from medical providers, pharmacists, and pharmaceutical companies. Those were not my personal warnings. They came from the experts who prescribe, fill, and manufacture drugs. Why would you or any member of your FB group have a problem with that? I would expect an honest journalist to report on those types of facts.

You also repeated an earlier accusation that I used "a hackneyed pejorative used in much material that rails against modern medicine." Is that your opinion or are you making a truth claim. If truth claim, what is your evidence? It would appear that you are also accusing me of railing 'against modern medicine.' That is untrue. You made the claim, so the burden of proof is on you.

If I have misread or misunderstood your comments, please let me know so I can respond appropriately. Thanks

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts